A Lagos State High Court sitting at the Tafawa Balewa Square (TBS) Monday fixed April 3 for ruling on the no-case submission filed by an Assistant Superintendent of Police (ASP), Drambi Vandi, who is standing trial for allegedly killing a Lagos-based lawyer, Omobolanle Raheem, on Christmas day.
Vandi is praying for the court to dismiss the suit and discharge him on the ground that he has no case to answer.
The defendant is accused of shooting Mrs Raheem last December 25, near Ajah Underbridge, Lagos.
She was four-month pregnant with twins.
The Lagos State Government preferred a one-count charge of murder against Vandi, in accordance with Section 223 of the Criminal Law of Lagos State, 2015.
“ASP Vandi on the 25th of December 2022 at Ajah roundabout along Lekki-Epe Expressway Lagos in the Lagos Judicial Division unlawfully killed one Omobolanle Raheem (F) by shooting her in the chest,” it reads.
Vandi pleaded not guilty and trial has since commenced.
At the resumption of proceedings yesterday, Justice Ibironke Harrison adjourned for ruling after the prosecution and defence counsels had adopted their final written addresses.
Defence counsel Adetokunbo Odutola, in adopting Vandi’s final written address on a no-case submission filed on February 28, prayed the court to dismiss the suit.
Odutola argued that the ballistics report tendered by the prosecution showed that the gun did not match the bullet that was shot.
According to him, the pathologist called in evidence by the prosecution stating that the bullet penetrated from the left through the armpit while the prosecution said that the deceased was shot in the chest.
He concluded that with these “inconsistencies” and several others, the prosecution had not made out a case against his client to warrant him to enter a defence.
But the prosecution team led by the Attorney-General of Lagos State, Moyosore Onigbanjo, opposed him, arguing that it had made out a prima facie case against the defendant making it necessary for him to put up a defence.
The defendant’s no-case submission was dated February 20 while the prosecution’s reply was dated February 24.
Disclaimer: infonte9ja.com shall not be liable to Opinions, Articles or Features that doesn't emanate from any of its staff and management. We also wish to reiterate that such personal or sponsored opinion, article or feature does not reflect the views of the publishers of infonet9ja.com, but the writer's
For publication of your news content, articles, videos or any other news worthy materials, please send to infonetnews9ja@gmail.com | For Advert and other info, you can call 09061217047 or send a WhatsApp Message to 09061217047
The defendant filed a reply on point of law dated February 27.
